Artículos científicos sobre Alta Sensibilidad

Son muchas las investigaciones relacionadas con la Alta Sensibilidad y cada día nuevos equipos en diferentes países y con diferentes especialidades colaboran con su trabajo a aumentar la base científica de este rasgo también llamado Sensibilidad de Procesamiento Sensorial. En este apartado estarán disponibles todas las investigaciones relacionadas con el rasgo, su gran mayoría están en inglés. En el área privada podrá acceder a estos documentos en español al igual que a otras investigaciones y trabajos no publicados.

En el presente listado se encuentra un resumen de los estudios relacionados con la investigación de la Alta Sensibilidad. Artículos científicos destinados a clarificar y ofrecer un espacio de consulta para investigadores y estudiantes cuyos trabajos TFG estén relacionados con la «sensibilidad de procesamiento sensorial» o las personas altamente sensibles.

Desde la Asociación Española de Profesionales de la Alta Sensibilidad apoyamos las investigaciones en este campo y tenemos en marcha además nuestras propias investigaciones. Si estás trabajando en alguna investigación relacionada o deseas que apoyemos o divulguemos tu trabajo puedes ponerte en contacto con nuestra área de investigación en contacto

Listado de investigaciones

  • Acevedo, B.P., Aron, E.N., Aron, A., Sangster, M.D., Collins, N., Brown, L., 2014. The highly sensitive brain: an fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others’ emotions. Brain Behav. 4 (4), 580–594.
  • Acevedo, B.P., Pospos, S., Lavretsky, H., 2016. The neural mechanisms of meditative practices: novel approaches for healthy aging. Curr. Behav. Neurosci. Rep. 3 (4), 328–339.
  • Acevedo, B.P., Jagiellowicz, J., Aron, E.N., Aron, A., Marhenke, R., 2017. Sensory processing sensitivity and childhood quality’s effects on neural responses to emotional stimuli. Neuropsychiatry 14 (5).
  • Acevedo, B.P., Aron, E.N., Pospos, S., Jessen, D., 2018. The functional highly sensitive brain: a review of the brain circuits underlying sensory processing sensitivity and seemingly related disorders. Philos. Trans. Biol. Sci. 373 (1744). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0161.
  • Ahadi, B., Basharpoor, S., 2010. Relationship between sensory processing sensitivity, personality dimensions and mental health. J. Appl. Sci. 10 (7), 570–574.
  • American Psychiatric Association, 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.
  • Andresen, M., Goldmann, P., Volodina, A., 2017. Do overwhelmed expatriates intend to leave? The effects of sensory processing sensitivity, stress, and social capital on expatriates’ turnover intention. Eur. Manag. Rev. 5 (3), 315–328.
  • Aron, E.N., 2002. The Highly Sensitive Child. Broadway Book - Thorsons., USA.
  • Aron EN and Aron A (1997) Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73: 345-368.
  • Aron EN Aron A and Davies KM (2005) Adult shyness: The interaction of temperamental sensitivity and an adverse childhood environment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31: 181- 197.
  • Aron, A., Ketay, S., Hedden, T., Aron, E.N., Rose Markus, H., Gabrieli, J.D., 2010. Temperament trait of sensory processing sensitivity moderates cultural differences in neural response. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 5 (2-3), 219–226.
  • Aron EN, Aron A and Jagiellowicz J (2012) Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review 16: 262-282.
  • Aron, E.N., Aron, A., Tillmann, T.C., 2018. Future directions for sensory processing sensitivity research. In: Paper Presented at the 30th Convention of the Association for Psychological Science. San Francisco, California.
  • Aron, E.N., Aron, A., Nardone, N., Zhou, S. (in press). Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of parenting: An exploratory study. Family Relations.
  • Assary, E., Pluess, M., 2017. Differential susceptibility in minority children: individual differences in environmental sensitivity. Handbook on Positive Development of Minority Children and Youth. Springer, Cham, pp. 139–152.
  • Assary, E., Vincent, J.P., Keers, R., Pluess, M., 2017. Gene-environment interaction and psychiatric disorders: review and future directions. Paper Presented at the Seminars in Cell Developmental Biology.
  • Assary, E., Zavos, H.M., Krapohl, E., Keers, R., Pluess, M. (in preparation). Sensitivity to the Environment Has Two Distinct Heritable Components.
  • Asscher, J., Dekovic, M., Den Akker, A.L., Manders, W.A., Prins, P.J., Van Der Laan, P.H., Prinzie, P., 2016. Do personality traits affect responsiveness of juvenile delinquents to treatment? J. Res. Pers. 63, 44–50.
  • Bakker K and Moulding R (2012) Sensory-Processing Sensitivity, dispositional mindfulness and negative psychological symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences 53: 341-346.
  • Barrett, L.F., Simmons, W.K., 2015. Interoceptive predictors in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 419–429.
  • Bearer, E.L., Zhang, X., Janvelyan, D., Boulat, B., Jacobs, R.E., 2009. Reward circuitry is perturbed in the absence of the serotonin transporter. Neuroimage 46 (4), 1091–1104.
  • Becerra, L., Pendse, G., Chang, P.-C., Bishop, J., Borsook, D., 2011. Robust reproducible resting state networks in the awake rodent brain. PLoS One 6 (10), e25701.
  • Beevers, C.G., Marti, C.N., Lee, H.J., Stote, D.L., Ferrell, R.E., Hariri, A.R., Telch, M.J., 2011. Associations between serotonin transporter gene promoter region (5-HTTLPR) polymorphism and gaze bias for emotional information. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 120 (1), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022125.
  • Belsky, J., 1997. Variation in susceptibility to rearing influences: an evolutionary argument. Psychol. Inq. 8, 182–186.
  • Belsky, J., Pluess, M., 2009. Beyond diathesis stress: differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychol. Bull. 135 (6), 885–908. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0017376.
  • Belsky, J., Hsieh, K.H., Crnic, K., 1998. Mothering, fathering, and infant negativity as antecedents of boys’ externalizing problems and inhibition at age 3 years: differential susceptibility to rearing experience? Dev. Psychopathol. 10 (2), 301–319.
  • Belsky, J., Pluess, M., Widaman, K.F., 2013. Confirmatory and competitive evaluation of alternative gene‐environment interaction hypotheses. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 54 10), 1135–1143.
  • Benham G (2006) The Highly Sensitive Person: Stress and physical symptom reports. Personality and Individual Differences 40(7): 1433-1440.
  • Blach C and Egger JW (2014) “The highly sensitive personality”–Report to research project high sensitivity. Psychological Medicine 22: 59-63.
  • Bons, D., van den Broek, E., Scheepers, F., Herpers, P., Rommelse, N., Buitelaaar, J.K., 2013. Motor, emotional, and cognitive empathy in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder and conduct disorder. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 41 (3), 425–443.
  • Boomsma, D., Busjahn, A., Peltonen, L., 2002. Classical twin studies and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3 (11), 872.
  • Booth C, Standage H and Fox E (2015) Sensory-processing sensitivity moderates the association between childhood experiences and adult life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences 87: 24-29.
  • Borries, F., 2012. Do the "Highly Sensitive" Exist? A Taxonometric Investigation of the Personality Construct Sensory Processing Sensivitity (Unpublished Diplomarbeit). University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
  • Boterberg, S., Warreyn, P., 2016. Making sense of it all: the impact of sensory processing sensitivity on daily functioning of children. Pers. Individ. Dif. 92, 80–86.
  • Bourgeron, T., 2015. From the genetic architeture to synaptic plasticity in autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16 (9), 551–563.
  • Boyce WT and Ellis BJ (2005) Biological sensitivity to context: An evolutionary-developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and Psychopathology 17(2): 271-301.
  • Braem, M., Asher, L., Furrer, S., Lechner, I., Würbel, H., Melotti, L., 2017. Development of the “highly Sensitive Dog” questionnaire to evaluate the personality dimension “Sensory Processing Sensitivity” in dogs. PLoS One 12 (5), e0177616.
  • Bratholm Wyller, H., Bratholm Wyller, V.B., Crane, C., Gjelsvik, B., 2018. The relationship between sensory processing sensitivity and psychological distress: a model of underpinning mechanisms and an analysis of therapeutic possibilities. Scand. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.15714/scandpsychol.4.e15.
  • Bridges, D., 2018. Neurosensitivity: Implications for Cognition and Creativity. Doctoral dissertation. School of Psychology. Plymouth University.
  • Bridges, D., Schendan, H. E. (in press, a). The Sensitive, Open Creator. Personality and Individual Differences. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.016.
  • Bridges, D., Schendan, H. E. (in press, b). Sensitive Individuals are More Creative. Personality and Individual Differences. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09. 015.
  • Brindle, K., Moulding, R., Bakker, K., Nedeljkovic, M., 2015. Is the relationship between sensory‐processing sensitivity and negative affect mediated by emotional regulation? Aust. J. Psychol. 67 (4), 214–221.
  • Bruining, H., de Sonneville, L., Swaab, H., de Jonge, M., Kas, M., van Engeland, H., Vorstman, J., 2010. Dissecting the clinical heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorders through defined genotypes. PLoS One 5 (5).
  • Bruining, H., Eijkermans, M.J., Kas, M.J., Curran, S.R., Vorstman, J.A., Bolton, P.F., 2014. Behavioral signatures related to genetic disorders in autism. Molecular Austims 5 (1).
  • Capotosto, P., Babiloni, C., Romani, G.L., Corbetta, M., 2011. Differential contribution of right and left parietal cortex to the control of spatial attention: a simultaneous EEG–rTMS study. Cereb. Cortex 22 (2), 446–454.
  • Carola, V., Gross, C., 2011. Mouse models of the 5-HTTLPR× stress risk factor for depression. Behavioral Neurogenetics. Springer, pp. 59–72.
  • Carr, M., Nielsen, T., 2017. A novel Differential Susceptibility framework for the study of nightmares: evidence for trait sensory processing sensitivity. Clin. Psychol. Rev.
  • Carson, S.H., Peterson, J.B., Higgins, D.M., 2003. Decreased Latent Inhibition Is Associated With Increased Creative Achievement in High-functioning Individuals. American Psychological Association.
  • Caspi, A., Hariri, A.R., Holmes, A., Uher, R., Moffitt, T.E., 2010. Genetic sensitivity to the environment: the case of the serotonin transporter gene and its implications for studying complex diseases and traits. Am. J. Psychiatry 167 (5), 509–527.
  • Castrén, E., 2013. Neuronal network plasticity and recovery from depression. JAMA Psychiatry 70 (9), 983–989.
  • Cavanna, A.E., Trimble, M.R., 2006. The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 129 (Pt 3), 564.
  • Cellot, G., Cherubini, E., 2014. GABAergic signaling as therapeutic target for autism spectrum disorders. Front. Pediatr. 2 (70).
  • Chen, C., Moyzis, R., Stern, H., He, Q., Li, H., Li, J., et al., 2011. Contributions of dopamine-related genes and environmental factors to highly sensitive personality: a multi-step neuronal system-level approach. PLoS One 6 (7), e21636. Doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021636.
  • Craig, A.D., 2009. Emotional moments across time: a possible neural basis for time perception in the anterior insula. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364 (1525), 1933.
  • Cross, E.S., Hamilton, A.Fd.C., Grafton, S.T., 2006. Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers. Neuroimage 31 (3), 1257–1267.
  • De Villiers, B., Lionetti, F., Pluess, M., 2018. Vantage sensitivity: a framework for individual differences in response to psychological intervention. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1471-0.
  • Del Giudice, M., Ellis, B.J., Shirtcliff, E.A., 2011. The adaptive calibration model of stress responsivity. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35 (7), 1562–1592. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.neubiorev.2010.11.007.
  • Delorme, R., Ey, E., Toro, R., Leboyer, M., Gillberg, C., Bourgeron, T., 2013. Progress toward treatments for synaptic defects in autism. Nat. Med. 19 (6), 685–694.
  • Dixon EA, Benham G, Sturgeon JA, et al. (2016) Development of the Sensory Hipersensitivity Scale (SHS): A self-report tool for assessing sensitivity to sensory stimuli. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 39: 537-550.
  • Dixon, M.L., Christoff, K., 2014. The lateral prefrontal cortex and complex value-based learning and decision making. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 45, 9–18.
  • Dunn, W., 1997. The impact of sensory processing abilities on the daily lives of young children and families: a conceptual model. Infants Young Child. 9 (4), 23–25.
  • Dyson, M.W., Olino, T.M., Dunn, W., Goldsmith, H.H., Klein, D.N., 2012. The structure of temperament in preschoolers: a two-stage factor analytic approach. Emotion 12 (1).
  • Ellis, B.J., Boyce, W.T., 2011. Differential susceptibility to the environment: toward an understanding of sensitivity to developmental experiences and context. Dev. Psychopathol. 23 (1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095457941000060x.
  • Ellis, B.J., Boyce, W.T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J., van IJzendoorn, M.H., 2011. Differential susceptibility to the environment: an evolutionary–neurodevelopmental theory. Dev. Psychopathol. 23 (1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0954579410000611.
  • Ershova R, Yarmotz E, Koryagina T, et al. (2018) A psychometric evaluation of the highly sensitive person scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity. Electronic Journal of General Medicine 15(6): 96.
  • Evans, D.E., Rothbart, M.K., 2008. Temperamental sensitivity: Two constructs or one? Pers. Individ. Dif. 44 (1), 108–118.
  • Evers, A., Rasche, J., Schabracq, M.J., 2008. High sensory processing sensitivity at work. Int. J. Stress Manag. 15 (2), 189–198.
  • Eysenck, H., 1967. Personality and extra-sensory perception. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research.
  • Flint, J., Munafò, M.R., 2013. Candidate and non-candidate genes in behavior genetics. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 23 (1), 57–61.
  • Gerstenberg, F.X.R., 2012. Sensory-processing sensitivity predicts performance on a visual search task followed by an increase in perceived stress. Pers. Individ. Dif. 53 (4), 496–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.019.
  • Ghanizadeh, A., 2011. Sensory processing problems in children with ADHD, a systematic review. Psychiatry Investig. 8 (2), 89–94.
  • Gillingham, G., 2000. Autism: A New Understanding. Tacit., Edmonton, Canada.
  • Goldberg, A., Ebraheem, Z., Freiberg, C., Ferarro, R., Chai, S., Gottfried, O.D., 2018. Sweet and sensitive: sensory processing sensitivity and type 1 diabetes. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 38, e35–e38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2017.10.015.
  • Goldsmith, H.H., Reilly, J., Lemery, K.S., Longley, S., Prescott, A., 1999. The Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery - Preschool version.
  • Gray, J.A., 1982. The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: an Enquiry Into Thefunctions of the Septo-hippocampal System. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Gray, J.A., McNaugthon, N., 2000. The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: an Enquiry Into the Functions of the Septo-hippocampal System, 2nd. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Greven CU, Lionetti F, Booth Ch, et al. (2019) Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the contexto of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews Mar, 98: 287-305.
  • Guidotti, G., Calabrese, F., Auletta, F., Olivier, J., Racagni, G., Homberg, J., Riva, M.A., 2012. Developmental influence of the serotonin transporter on the expression of npas4 and GABAergic markers: modulation by antidepressant treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology 37 (3), 746–758.
  • Grimen H and Diseth Å. (2016) Sensory Processing Sensitivity. Perceptual and Motor Skills 123(3), 637-653.
  • Gusnard, D.A., Akbudak, E., Shulman, G.L., Raichle, M.E., 2001. Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98 (7), 4259–4264.
  • Hacker, C.D., Snyder, A.Z., Pahwa, M., Corbetta, M., Leuthardt, E.C., 2017. Frequencyspecific electrophysiologic correlates of resting state fMRI networks. NeuroImage 149, 446–457.
  • Haslam, N., Holland, E., Kuppens, P., 2012. Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: a quantitative review of taxometric research. Psychol. Med. 42 (5), 903–920.
  • Hentges, R.F., Davies, P.T., Cicchetti, D., 2015. Temperament and interparental conflict: the role of negative emotionality in predicting child behavioral problems. Child Dev. 86 (5), 1333–1350.
  • Herzog, M.H., Clarke, A.M., 2014. Why vision is not both hierarchical and feedforward. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 8, 135.
  • Hofmann SG and Bitran S (2007) Sensory-processing sensitivity in social anxiety disorder: Relationship to harm avoidance and diagnostic subtypes. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 21(7): 944-954.
  • Holm, SEH, Hansen, B., Kvale, G., Eilertsen, T., Hagen, K. y Solem, S. (2019). ¿La sensibilidad del procesamiento sensorial está relacionada con el resultado del tratamiento en el tratamiento de prevención de respuesta y exposición concentrada para el trastorno obsesivo compulsivo? Revista de trastornos obsesivo-compulsivos y trastornos relacionados, 23, 100486. doi: 10.1016 / j.jocrd.2019.100486
  • Homberg, J.R., Lesch, K.P., 2011. Looking on the bright side of serotonin transporter gene variation. Biol. Psychiatry 69 (6), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych. 2010.09.024.
  • Homberg, J.R., van den Hove, D.L.A., 2012. The serotonin transporter gene and functional and pathological adaptation to environmental variation across the life span. Prog. Neurobiol. 99 (2), 117–127.
  • Homberg, J.R., De Boer, S.F., Raasø, H.S., Olivier, J.D., Verheul, M., Ronken, E., et al., 2008. Adaptations in pre-and postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor function and cocaine supersensitivity in serotonin transporter knockout rats. Psychopharmacology 200 (3), 367–380.
  • Homberg, J.R., Schubert, D., Asan, E., Aron, E.N., 2016. Sensory processing sensitivity and serotonin gene variance: insights into mechanisms shaping environmental sensitivity. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 71, 472–483.
  • Homberg, J.R., Kozicz, T., Fernández, G., 2017. Large-scale network balances in the transition from adaptive to maladaptive stress responses. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 14, 27–32.
  • Huang, S.-M., Wu, Y.-L., Peng, S.-L., Peng, H.-H., Huang, T.-Y., Ho, K.-C., Wang, F.-N., 2016. Inter-strain differences in default mode network: a resting state fmri study on spontaneously hypertensive rat and Wistar Kyoto rat. Sci. Rep. 6, 21697.
  • Huber, M., Knottnerus, J.A., Green, L., van der Horst, H., Jadad, A.R., Kromhout, D., et al., 2011. How should we define health? BMJ: Br. Med. J. (Online) 343.
  • Insel, T.R., 2014. The NIMH research domain criteria (RDoC) project: precision medicine for psychiatry. Am. J. Psychiatry 171 (4), 395–397.
  • Jagiellowicz, J., Xu, X., Aron, A., Aron, E.N., Cao, G., Feng, T., Weng, X., 2012. The trait of sensory processing sensitivity and neural responses to changes in visual scenes. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 6 (1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq001.
  • Jagiellowicz, J., Aron, A., Aron, E.N., 2016. Relation between the temperament trait of sensory processing sensitivity and emotional reactivity. Soc. Behav. Pers. 44 (2), 185–200.
  • Jerome, E.M., Liss, M., 2005. Relationships between sensory processing style, adult attachment, and coping. Pers. Individ. Dif. 38 (6), 1341–1352.
  • Jeste, S.S., Geschwind, D.H., 2014. Disentangling the heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorder through genetic findings. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 10 (2), 74–81.
  • Jonsson, K., Grim, K., Kjellgren, A., 2014. Do highly sensitive persons experience more nonordinary states of consciousness during sensory isolation? Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J. 42 (9), 1495–1506.
  • Kaestner, N., Richter, S.H., Lesch, K.-P., Schreiber, R.S., Kaiser, S., Sachser, N., 2015. Benefits of a “vulnerability gene”? A study in serotonin transporter knockout mice. B ehav. Brain Res. 283, 116–120.
  • Kagan, J., 1994a. Galen’s Prophecy. Basic Books, New York. Kagan, J., 1994b. On the nature of emotion. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 59 (2-3), 7–24.
  • Kagan, J., 2002. Childhood predictors of state anxiety. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 4 (3), 287–293.
  • Kalueff, A., Olivier, J., Nonkes, L., Homberg, J., 2010. Conserved role for the serotonin transporter gene in rat and mouse neurobehavioral endophenotypes. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34 (3), 373–386.
  • Keers, R., Pluess, M., 2017. Childhood quality influences genetic sensitivity to environmental influences across adulthood: a life-course Gene× Environment interaction study. Dev. Psychopathol. 29 (5), 1921–1933.
  • Khoury, B., Lecomte, T., Fortin, G., Masse, M., Therien, P., Bouchard, V., et al., 2013. Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 33 (6), 763–771.
  • Kibe, C., Suzuki, M., Hirano, M. y Boniwell, I. (2020). Sensibilidad al procesamiento sensorial y educación en resiliencia culturalmente modificada: susceptibilidad diferencial en adolescentes japoneses. PLOS ONE, 15 (9), e0239002. doi: 10.1371 / journal.pone.0239002
  • Kleckner, I.R., Zhang, J., Touroutoglou, A., Chanes, L., Xia, C., Simmons, W.K., et al., 2017. Evidence for a large-scale brain system supporting allostasis and interoception in humans. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1 (5), 0069.
  • Konrad S and Herzberg PY (2017) Psychometric properties and validation of a german high sensitive person scale (HSPS-G). European Journal of Psychological Assessment 35(3): 364-378.
  • Kroenung, R.L., 2015. The Latent Structure of Sensitivity - a Taxometric Analysis of Sensory-processing Sensitivity. unpublished master’s thesis. University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
  • Kuyken, W., Warren, F.C., Taylor, R.S., Whalley, B., Crane, C., Bondolfi, G., et al., 2016. Efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in prevention of depressive relapse: an individual patient data meta-analysis from randomized trials. JAMA Psychiatry 73 (6), 565–574.
  • Lang, P., Bradley, M.M., 2007. The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention. Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment. pp. 29.
  • Lau, J.Y., Waters, A.M., 2017. Annual Research Review: an expanded account of information‐processing mechanisms in risk for child and adolescent anxiety and depression. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 58 (4), 387–407.
  • Licht, C.L., Mortensen, E.L., Knudsen, G.M., 2011. Association between sensory processing sensitivity and the 5-HTTLPR Short/Short genotype. Biol. Psychiatry 69, 152S–153S (Supplement for Society of Biological Psychiatry Convention and Annual Meeting, abstract, 510).
  • Lionetti, F., Aron, E.N., Aron, A., Klein, D.N., Pluess, M., 2017. Evaluating environmental sensitivity in preschoolers: the highly sensitive child rating system. Paper Presented at the 18th European Conference on Developmental Psychology Utrecht.
  • Lionetti, F., Aron, A., Aron, E.N., Burns, L.G., Jagiellowicz, J., Pluess, M., 2018. Dandelions, Tulips and Orchids: evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, mediumsensitive, and high-sensitive individuals. Transl. Psychiatry 8 (24). https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41398-017-0090-6.
  • Lionetti, F., Klein, D. N., Aron, A., Aron, E., & Pluess, M. (under review). Observer-Rated Environmental Sensitivity Moderates Children’s Response to Parenting Quality in Early Childhood.
  • Liss, M., Timmel, L., Baxley, K., Killingsworth, P., 2005. Sensory processing sensitivity and its relation to parental bonding, anxiety, and depression. Pers. Individ. Dif. 39 (8), 1429–1439.
  • Liss, M., Mailloux, J., Erchull, M.J., 2008. The relationships between sensory processing sensitivity, alexithymia, autism, depression, and anxiety. Pers. Individ. Dif. 45 (3), 255–259.
  • Listou Grimen, H., Diseth, Å., 2016. Sensory processing sensitivity: factors of the highly sensitive person scale and their relationships to personality and subjective health complaints. Percept. Mot. Skills 123 (3), 637–653.
  • Lu, H., Zou, Q., Gu, H., Raichle, M.E., Stein, E.A., Yang, Y., 2012. Rat brains also have a default mode network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109 (10), 3979–3984.
  • Luoni, A., Hulsken, S., Cazzaniga, G., Racagni, G., Homberg, J.R., Riva, M.A., 2013. Behavioural and neuroplastic properties of chronic lurasidone treatment in serotonin transporter knockout rats. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 16 (6), 1319–1330.
  • Marco, E.J., Hinkley, L.B., Hill, S.S., Nagarajan, S.S., 2011. Sensory processing in autism: a review of neurophysiologic findings. Pediatr. Res. 69 (5 Pt 2), 48R–54R.
  • Martindale, C., 1977. Creativity, consciousness, and cortical arousal. J. Altered States Conscious.
  • Martindale, C., Anderson, K., Moore, K., West, A.N., 1996. Creativity, oversensitivity, and rate of habituation. Pers. Individ. Dif. 20 (4), 423–427.
  • McCrae, R., Costa, P., 1994. The stability of personality: observation and evaluations. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 3, 173–175.
  • Meredith, P.J., Bailey, K.J., Strong, J., Rappel, G., 2016. Adult attachment, sensory processing, and distress in healthy adults. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 70 (1) 7001250010p7001250011-7001250010p7001250018.
  • Meyer, B., Muriel, A., David, P.B., 2005. Sensory sensitivity, attachment experiences, and rejection responses among adults with boderline and avoidant personality features. J. Pers. Disord. 19 (6), 641–658.
  • Miceli, S., Nadif Kasri, N., Joosten, J., Huang, C., Kepser, L., Proville, R., et al., 2017. Reduced inhibition within layer IV of sert knockout rat barrel cortex is associated with faster sensory integration. Cereb. Cortex 27 (2), 933–949.
  • Monroe, S.M., Simons, A.D., 1991. Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: implications for the depressive disorders. Psychol. Bull. 110 (3), 406–425.
  • Montoya, A., Colom, F., Ferrin, M., 2011. Is psychoeducation for parents and teachers of children and adolescents with ADHD efficacious? A systematic literature review. Eur. Psychiatry 26 (3), 166–175.
  • Montoya-Pérez KS, Ortega JIM, Montes-Delgado R, et al. (2019) Psychometric Properties of The Highly Sensitive Person Scale In Mexican Population. Psychology Research and Behavior Management 12: 1081-1086.
  • Neal, J.A., Edelmann, R.J., Glachan, M., 2002. Behavioural inhibition and symptoms of anxiety and depression: Is there a specific relationship with social phobia? Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 41 (4), 361–374.
  • Nocentini, A., Menesini, E., Lionetti, F., Pluess, M., 2017. Highly sensitive child scale: investigation of construct validity in a sample of Italian children. Paper Presented at the European Conference of Developmental Psychology.
  • Nocentini, A., Menesini, E., Pluess, M., 2018. The personality trait of environmental sensitivity predicts children’s positive response to school-based anti-bullying intervention. Clin. Psychol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618782194.
  • Nonkes, L.J., van de Vondervoort, I.I., de Leeuw, M.J., Wijlaars, L.P., Maes, J.H., Homberg, J.R., 2012. Serotonin transporter knockout rats show improved strategy set-shifting and reduced latent inhibition. Learn. Mem. 19 (5), 190–193.
  • Nonkes, L.J., Maes, J.H., Homberg, J.R., 2013. Improved cognitive flexibility in serotonin transporter knockout rats is unchanged following chronic cocaine self‐administration. Addict. Biol. 18 (3), 434–440.
  • Pang, R.D., Wang, Z., Klosinski, L.P., Guo, Y., Herman, D.H., Celikel, T., et al., 2011. Mapping functional brain activation using [14C]-iodoantipyrine in male serotonin transporter knockout mice. PLoS One 6 (8), e23869.
  • Pearson, R., McGeary, J.E., Maddox, W.T., Beveers, C.G., 2016. Serotonin promoter polymorphism (5-HTLPR) predicts biased attention for emotion stimuli: Preliminary evidence of moderation by the social environment. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 4 (1), 122–128.
  • Pennisi, E., 2016. The power of personality. Science 352 (6286), 644–647.
  • Pérez-Chacón M, Chacón A, Borda-Mas M, et al. (2021) Sensory Processing Sensitivity and Compassion Satisfaction as Risk/Protective Factors from Burnout and Compassion Fatigue in Healthcare and Education Professionals. International Journal of Environmental Research of Public Health, 18: Art 611.
  • Pluess, M., 2015. Individual differences in environmental sensitivity. Child Dev. Perspect. 9 (3), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12120.
  • Pluess, M., Belsky, J., 2009. Differential susceptibility to rearing experience: the case of childcare. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 50 (4), 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1469-7610.2008.01992.x.
  • Pluess, M., Belsky, J., 2015. Vantage sensitivity: genetic susceptibility to effects of positive experiences. In: Pluess, M. (Ed.), Genetics of Psychological Well-Being. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 193–210.
  • Pluess, M., Boniwell, I., 2015. Sensory-Processing Sensitivity predicts treatment response to a school-based depression prevention program: evidence of Vantage Sensitivity. Pers. Individ. Dif. 82 (0), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.011.
  • Pluess, M., Belsky, J., Way, B.M., Taylor, S.E., 2010. 5-HTTLPR moderates effects of current life events on neuroticism: differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 34 (6), 1070–1074. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.05.028.
  • Pluess, M., Assary, E., Lionetti, F., Lester, K.J., Krapohl, E., Aron, E.N., Aron, A., 2017. Environmental sensitivity in children: development of the highly sensitive child scale and identification of sensitivity groups. Dev. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/ dev0000406.
  • Rappaport, M.B., Corbally, C., 2018. Evolution of religious capacity in the genus homo: trait complexity in action through compassion. J. Religion Sci. 53 (1), 198–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12387.
  • Redfearn RA, Van Ittersum KW and Stenmark CK (2020) El impacto de la sensibilidad del procesamiento sensorial sobre el estrés y el agotamiento en enfermeras. Revista Internacional de Manejo del Estrés 27(4): 370-379.
  • Rende, R., Slomkowski, C., 2005. DeFries–Fulker analysis. Encycl. Stat. Behave. Sci.
  • Rinn, A.N., Mullet, D.R., Jett, N., Nyikos, T., 2018. Sensory processing sensitivity among high-ability individuals: a psychometric evaluation of the highly sensitive person scale. Roeper Rev. 40 (3), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018. 1466840.
  • Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L., 1996. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cogn. Brain Res. 3 (2), 131–141.
  • Rizzo-Sierra, C.V., 2012. The human sensory processing sensitivity: biological implications for introversion, submission and creativity. Hypotheses in Clinical Medicine. Nova Science Publisher.
  • Rizzo-Sierra, C.V., Leon-S, M.E., Leon-Sarmiento, F.E., 2012. Higher sensory processing sensitivity, introversion and ectomorphism: new biomarkers for human creativity in developing rural areas. J. Neurosci. Rural Pract. 3 (2), 159. https://doi.org/10.4103/ 0976-3147.98314.
  • Robbins, T., 2018. Opinion on monoaminergic contributions to traits and temperament. Philos. Trans. Biol. Sci. 373 (1744), 20170153.
  • Robertson, C.E., Baron-Cohen, S., 2017. Sensory perception in autism. Nature Review Neuroscience 18 (11), 671–684.
  • Rodriguez-Seijas, C., Eaton, N.R., Krueger, R.F., 2015. How transdiagnostic factors of personality and psychopathology can inform clinical assessment and intervention. J. Pers. Assess. 97 (5), 425–435.
  • Roiser, J.P., Rogers, R.D., Cook, L.J., Sahakian, B.J., 2006. The effect of polymorphism at the serotonin transporter gene on decision-making, memory and executive function in ecstasy users and controls. Psychopharmacology 188 (2), 213–227.
  • Roisman, G.I., Newman, D.A., Fraley, R.C., Haltigan, J.D., Groh, A.M., Haydon, K.C., 2012. Distinguishing differential susceptibility from diathesis–stress: recommendations for evaluating interaction effects. Dev. Psychopathol. 24 (2), 389–409.
  • Rothbart, M.K., 2007. Temperament, development, and personality. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16 (4), 207–212.
  • Rothbart, M.K., 2011. Becoming Who We Are: Temperament and Personality in Development. Guilford Press.
  • Rothbart, M.K., Derryberry, D., 1981. Development of individual differences in temperament. In: In: Lamb, M.E., Brown, A.L. (Eds.), Advances in Developmental Psychology Vol. 1. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 37–86.
  • Rubaltelli, E., Scrimin, S., Moscardino, U., Priolo, G., Buodo, G., 2018. Media exposure to terrorism and people’s risk perception: the role of environmental sensitivity and psychophysiological response to stress. Br. J. Psychol.
  • Ruscio, J., Ruscio, A.M., 2004. Clarifying boundary issues in psychopathology: the role of taxometrics in a comprehensive program of structural research. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 113 (1), 24.
  • Sandin, S., Lichtenstein, P., Kuja-Halkola, R., Hultman, C., Larsson, H., Reichenberg, A., 2017. The heritability of autism spectrum disorder. Jama 318 (12), 1182–1184.
  • Schendan, H.E., Ganis, G., 2015. Top-down modulation of visual processing and C knowledge after 250 ms supports object constancy of category decisions. Front. Psychol. 6, 1289.
  • Schipper, P., Bosch, K., Hiemstra, M., Glotzbach, S., Klumpers, F., Henckens, M.J.A.G., Homberg, J.R. (submitted). The Association between Serotonin Transporter Availability and Neural Correlates of Fear Bradycardia in Response to Threat.
  • Schmueckle, M., Lindert, J., Schmolz, G., 2017. Psychological well-being of highly-sensitive persons in transition to parenthood-A cross-sectional study. Gesundheitswesen 79 (12), e126–e133. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1549984.
  • Seligman, M.E., 2011. Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and WellBeing. Free Press, New York, NY.
  • Şengül-İnal, G., Sümer, N., 2017. Exploring the multidimensional structure of sensory processing sensitivity in turkish samples. Curr. Psychol. 1–13.
  • Shakeshaft, N.G., Trzaskowski, M., McMillan, A., Krapohl, E., Simpson, M.A., Reichenberg, A., et al., 2015. Thinking positively: the genetics of high intelligence. Intelligence 48, 123–132.
  • Shiota, M.N., Keltner, D., Mossman, A., 2007. The nature of awe: elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cogn. Emot. 21 (5), 944–963.
  • Sierakowiak, A., Monnot, C., Aski, S.N., Uppman, M., Li, T.-Q., Damberg, P., Brené, S., 2015. Default mode network, motor network, dorsal and ventral basal ganglia networks in the rat brain: comparison to human networks using resting state-fMRI. PLoS One 10 (3), e0120345.
  • Slagt M, Dubas JS, Van Aken MA, et al. (2018) Sensory processing sensitivity as a marker of differential susceptibility to parenting. Developmental Psychology 54(3): 543-558.
  • Smith, S.M., Fox, P.T., Miller, K.L., Glahn, D.C., Fox, P.M., Mackay, C.E., et al., 2009. Correspondence of the brain’s functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106 (31), 13040–13045.
  • Smith, S.M., Fox, P.T., Miller, K.L., Glahn, D.C., Fox, P.M., Mackay, C.E., et al., 2009. Correspondence of the brain’s functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106 (31), 13040–13045.
  • Smith, H.L., Sriken, J., Erford, B.T. Clinical and Research Utility of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale. Journal of Mental Health Counseling (2019) 41 (3): 221–241. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.41.3.03
  • Smolewska K, McCabe S and Woody E (2006) A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “Big Five”. Personality and Individual Differences 40(6): 1269-1279.
  • Sobocko, K., Zelenski, J.M., 2015. Trait Sensory-Processing Sensitivity and subjective well-being: distinctive associations for different aspects of sensitivity. Pers. Individ. Dif. 83, 44–49.
  • Soons, I., Brouwers, A., Tomic, W., 2010. An experimental study of the psychological impact of a Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program on highly sensitive persons. Eur. J. Psychol. 6 (4), 148.
  • Sridharan, D., Levitin, D.J., Menon, V., 2008. A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105 (34), 12569–12574.
  • Stern BZ, Strober LB and Goverover Y (2020) Relationship between sensory processing patterns, trait anxiety, and health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Health Psychology 1-12
  • Su, X., Cai, R.Y., Uljarević, M., 2018. Predictors of mental health in chinese parents of children with autism Spectrum disorder (ASD). J. Autism Dev. Disord. 48 (4), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3364-1.
  • Suomi, S.J., 1997. Early determinants of behaviour: evidence from primate studies. Br. Med. Bull. 53 (1), 170–184.
  • Tatti, R., Haley, M.S., Swanson, O.K., Tselha, T., Maffei, A., 2017. Neurophysiology and regulation of the balance between excitation and inhibition in neocortical circuits. Biol. Psychiatry 81 (10), 821–831.
  • Þórarinsdóttir, Þ.K., 2018. Psychometric Properties of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale and Its Relationship to the Big Five Personality Traits in a Sample of Icelandic University Students. Doctoral dissertation. University of Reykjavik.
  • Tillman T, Matany KD and Duttweiler H (2018) Measuring Environmental Sensitivity in Educational Contexts: A Validation Study With German-Speaking Students. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology 8(2): 17-28.
  • Tran, L., Treur, J., Tuinhof, D.J., 2018. A network-oriented adaptive agent model for learning regulation of a highly sensitive person’s response. International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 248–261. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-94580-4_20.
  • Trull, T.J., Widiger, T.A., Useda, J.D., Holcomb, J., Doan, B.-T., Axelrod, S.R., et al., 1998. A structured interview for the assessment of the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Psychol. Assess. 10 (3), 229.
  • Utzerath, C., Fernández, G., 2017. Shaping science for increasing interdependence and specialization. Trends Neurosci. 40 (3), 121–124.
  • Van der Doelen, R.H.A., Deschamps, W., D’annibale, C., Peeters, D., Wevers, R.A., Zelena, D., et al., 2014. Early life adversity and serotonin transporter gene variation interact at the level of the adrenal gland to affect the adult hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. Transl. Psychiatry 4 (7), e409.
  • Van der Marel, K., Homberg, J.R., Otte, W.M., Dijkhuizen, R.M., 2013. Functional and structural neural network characterization of serotonin transporter knockout rats. PLoS One 8 (2), e57780.
  • Van Overwalle, F., Baetens, K., 2009. Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: a meta-analysis. Neuroimage 48 (3), 564–584.
  • Wachs, T.D., 2013. Relation of maternal personality to perceptions of environmental chaos in the home. J. Environ. Psychol. 34, 1–9.
  • Walkup, J.T., Mathews, T., Green, C.M., 2017. Transdiagnostic behavioral therapies in pediatric primary care: looking ahead. JAMA Psychiatry 74 (6), 557–558.
  • Wang, X.J., 2010. Neurophsyiological and computational principles of cortical rhytms in cognition. Physiol. Rev. 90 (3), 1195–1268.
  • Weyn, S., Van Leuuwen, K., Pluess, M., Lionetti, F., Greven, C., Goosens, L., et al. (under review). Psychometric Properties of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale Across Developmental Stage, Gender, and Country.
  • Widaman, K.F., Helm, J.L., Castro-Schilo, L., Pluess, M., Stallings, M.C., Belsky, J., 2012. Distinguishing ordinal and disordinal interactions. Psychol. Methods 17 (4), 615–622.
  • Wolf, M., van Doorn, G.S., Weissing, F.J., 2008. Evolutionary emergence of responsive and unresponsive personalities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (41), 15825–15830. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805473105.
  • Woods, R.L., Colvin, C.R., Vera-Diaz, F.A., Peli, E., 2010. A relationship between tolerance of blur and personality. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51 (11), 6077–6082. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-5013.
  • Woodward, S.A., Lenzenweger, M.F., Kagan, J., Snidman, N., Arcus, D., 2000. Taxonic structure of infant reactivity: evidence from a taxometric perspective. Psychol. Sci. 11 (4), 296–301.
  • Yano, K., Oishi, K., 2018. The relationships among daily exercise, sensory-processing sensitivity, and depressive tendency in Japanese university students. Pers. Individ. Dif. 127, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.047.
  • Ye, Q., Zou, F., Lau, H., Hu, Y., Kwok, S.C., 2018. Causal evidence for mnemonic metacognition in human precuneus. J. Neurosci. 38 (28), 6379. C.U
Ir arriba